Andrew Tate Florida Situation is Crazy, Trans Troop Ban, Huge MrBeast $$$ News, & Meet Dr. Lin
PDS Published 02/27/2025
-
Andrew and Tristan took a private plane out of Romania and landed in Florida this morning after Romania lifted the travel restrictions they had been under.[]
And Andrew briefly answered questions from the press after landing, condemning the media for what he called spinning narratives against him and adding:
“We live in a democratic society where it is innocent until proven guilty, and I think my brother and I are largely misunderstood. There’s a lot of opinions about us, a lot of things that go around about us on the Internet. We have yet to be convicted of any crimes in our lives, ever.” (1:41:25-1:41:36)
As for how we got here, Romania’s anti-organized crime agency, DIICOT released a statement announcing that two unnamed defendants, who were later confirmed to be the Tates, are now allowed to leave the country but have to remain under judicial supervision.[]
Meaning they still have to appear before authorities when summoned, and failure to comply could lead to stricter measures being put back in place.
But even though restrictions were lifted, the cases against them are still ongoing.
They were indicted last year in Romania on trafficking charges, and while a court ruled that case could not go to trial, it is still open, and there is another ongoing investigation into them in the country.[]
An appeals court also previously granted a request to extradite the brothers to the UK, but only after the cases in Romania had wrapped up.
They have denied any wrongdoing, and now, given that they are in the U.S., there are questions about if they will ever go back to Romania.[]
And if you have been following this case, you know that the Tates have been trying to get out of the country for quite some time to no avail, which has people wondering why they finally got the greenlight now.
And, well, earlier this month, there were reports saying that the Trump administration was going to urge Romania to lift travel restrictions on them.
The Tates have notably become prominent right-wing figures, frequently tweeting in support of Trump and suggesting he could help them.[][][][][]
So tons of reports have been questioning if the Trump administration was part of any official efforts to get them on U.S. ground.
Per the New York Times, Romanian officials said the U.S. had not put pressure on them, and a lawyer for the brothers said he could not give any comment on whether or not stateside officials used their power in this decision,[]
But he also did tell the outlet:
“Do the math. These guys are on the plane.”
His statements to other outlets were a little bit more discreet though, simply not providing details on the White House’s involvement to NBC News but saying:[]
"Our position is that Andrew and Tristan have long been targets of lawfare. They have maintained their innocence, arguing the accusations against them are defamatory and false."
But even though there are more questions than official answers, many believe that there was political influence from the U.S. here.
With Matthew Jury, a lawyer representing women in the UK who have accused Andrew Tate of sexual assault, writing on Twitter:
“The news that pressure by the Trump Administration has led to Andrew Tate, and his brother Tristan, being allowed to leave Romania by its authorities is equal parts disgusting and dismaying.”[]
“That the US Government would choose to lobby for his release is absurd but sadly, given its actions over the past month, perhaps unsurprising.”
“Any suggestion that the Tates will now face justice in Romania is fanciful.”
Claiming that there is evidence to support the allegations against Andrew and calling for authorities in the UK to secure his extradition.
And he is not the only one condemning the brother’s presence in America.
With Florida Governor Ron Desantis talking to reporters this morning and saying:
“The reality is no, Florida is not a place where you are welcome with that type of conduct in the air. I don’t know how it came to this. We were not involved. We were not notified. I found out through the media.”
Though obviously, Tate’s supporters have celebrated the news.
And obviously, we will have to see where all of this goes, how it impacts the legal proceedings against the brothers, if we learn anything else about what prompted restrictions to be released.
But I would love to know your thoughts on any of this here.
-
Because Bloomberg just reported that he is looking to raise “a couple hundred million dollars” in a funding round to expand his businesses, which is a move that would value his company at about five bil.[]
With sources telling the outlet he “is raising money to fund a holding company that owns all or part of several businesses.”
Right, brands like Featables, Lunchly, his production company, and he is reportedly looking to expand both his packaged goods and media brands.
Right now, it is unclear who or what firms are considering investing, and talks are reportedly still in early stages.
And this is not the first time he has raised money, funds from the firm Alpha Wave Global in the past.
But it comes as MrBeast has been making more business moves lately, right.
Last month, there were tons of headlines about him joining a bid to buy TikTok.
Right, saying he was part of an effort led by a major tech entrepreneur, but details on the size of the bid were not made clear.
And it’s kind of been a while since we saw headlines about where any potential purchase of TikTok was going, so that all remains up in the air.
But this news also comes as MrBeast own recent efforts to expand his entertainment empire have been successful, right.
His Beast Games Amazon show reportedly got 50 million viewers in 25 days, which is a record for unscripted programming on the service.
And Bloomberg says that Amazon is already prepared to spend big bucks on two more seasons of it.[]
So we will have to see what comes of this funding, and then what MrBeast decided to do with it next if he does get that much money, right, where does he go from here, where do you go next for someone who already has their hands in so many pots.
-
We’ve gotta talk about the big question hanging over everyone’s heads today: what’s gonna happen to our flu shots next season?
Because yesterday afternoon, the FDA reportedly canceled a scheduled meeting of an advisory committee that selects which flu strains to prepare for. [Quote, find “Wednesday”]
And experts say this meeting is crucial; right, every year the agency predicts which flu strains will be circulating next winter, and the drug companies make vaccines for those particular strains. [Image]
So the fear is that without guidance from the federal government, next season’s flu shots could be ineffective, causing a resurgence of deadly influenza.
Now reportedly there was no reason given for the decision to cancel this meeting, which was set for March 13. [Quote, find “no reason”]
And let’s be clear; if this meeting doesn’t happen, they can’t just reschedule it last minute.
Because as Richard Hughes, a lawyer for some vaccine makers, explained to The New York Times, the vaccine manufacturing schedule is quite strict. [Quote, find “strict”]
With the FDA meeting usually taking place in February or March, and then production typically starting in June, lining up distribution for September.
So you have one committee member telling CBS News: [Screenshot, guy on right]
“We're all left trying to understand what is going on. Why was this meeting canceled? It's an important meeting. What's the plan for flu vaccines this year?” [Quote]
And adding to The Times:
“It’s a six-month production cycle. So one can only assume that we’re not picking flu strains this year.” [Quote]
Now in response to the panic, an HHS spokesperson told CBS News:
“The FDA will make public its recommendations to manufacturers in time for updated vaccines to be available for the 2025-2026 influenza season.” [Quote]
But it’s unclear on what basis the agency will make the recommendation without consulting the panel or the World Health Organization.
Right, because on top of ordering the U.S. to begin withdrawing from the WHO, Trump banned federal health officials from communicating with it altogether.
Which is huge because every year, a W.H.O. advisory committee holds its own week-long meeting to pick the flu strains for the Northern Hemisphere, and this one’s already happening this week. [Image]
With its recommendations typically influencing the FDA committee’s decision.
And that breakdown of cooperation hurts both sides, since Trump reportedly made the CDC stop contributing influenza data to two W.H.O.-managed databases, FluNet and FluID, back in January.
However, Stat News reported Monday that officials from both the FDA and the CDC were attending the WHO meeting virtually. [Headline]
So it’s unclear what’s going on there — whether they got a waiver or not — but either way, it’s a good sign for public health.
Though don’t get too hopeful, because there’s still more bad news.
With the CDC confirming last week that it postponed a meeting of its own vaccine advisory committee that was supposed to happen this week. [Headline and Image]
Right, that committee meets several times a year to review the scientific data on new and updated vaccines so the agency can decide whether to advise use of them.
Which then notably sets insurance and government coverage in motion. [Quote, find “motion”]
And this meeting was set to consider several important shots, including GSK’s meningococcal [Pronounce] vaccine, a new chikungunya [Pronounce] vaccine, the new at-home influenza nasal spray, and a vaccine for HPV. [Quote, find “nasal”]
With that last one of special note because RFK Jr., the new health secretary, has criticized it and worked on a lawsuit against its maker, Merck. [Quote, find “HPV”]
Now the HHS did at least provide a reason for postponing this meeting, with a spokesperson saying there needed to be more time for public comment. [Quote, find “public comment”]
But for many, that felt like a trivial pretext to delay the rollout of life-saving medicine.
Right, just taking the flu, for example, the CDC reports that it’s killed 86 children and 19,000 adults so far this season. [Quote, find “86” and “19,000”]
With about 430,000 people being hospitalized and at least 33 million people getting infected. [Same quote]
So experts warn that without effective vaccines, we can expect to see those numbers rise next winter.
Links:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/us/politics/fda-flu-vaccine.html
Go to MyHeritage to get your 14-day free trial of their Complete plan.
-
I have three big pieces of Trump administration news you need to know today.
Starting with the news that the administration has officially said it is cutting more than 90% of USAIDs foreign aid contracts worth $60 billion —
Marking the first time we have a number showing the full scale of Trump and Musk’s efforts to end the majority of U.S. aid and development abroad.
Right, and this news was made public in court filings yesterday in a case where a judge ordered the administration to release nearly $2 billion in back payments.
With foreign aid contractors claiming in a lawsuit that money they are owed for services already rendered has been blocked under Trump’s funding freeze even after a judge ordered him to release it.
But yesterday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the lower court judge’s order, granting the Trump administration a stay while litigation plays out.
Which is actually super significant because it marks the first time the high court has weighed in on Trump’s efforts to gut the federal bureaucracy.
But, as far as how that fits into what we’re talking about today, the filings in that case stated that these cuts come from Trump’s Jan. 20th order cutting off all foreign aid and giving relevant agencies 90 days to review which USAID programs should continue.
Right, and we’ve covered the efforts to gut USAID numerous times on the show as this whole ordeal has been ongoing.
So the only thing here that’s really new is that we now have numbers that illustrate the sheer scale of these efforts.
And as far as specifics, according to a State Department memo accessed by the Associated Press, the administration says it will eliminate the vast majority of multiyear USAID contracts — 5,800 of 6,200 in total, which together are worth $54 billion.
And that’s on top of almost half of all State Department grants, with the memo saying the administration is scrapping 4,100 of those 9,100 awards for a cut of $4.4 billion.
Now, as for the contracts that are still in place, we don’t know the exact details.
But they could be part of a waiver program Secretary of State Marco Rubio implemented that gave exemptions to the funding freeze for organizations that provide “life-saving humanitarian assistance.”
Though, very notably here, it’s been widely reported that funds for the life-saving aid have still been frozen, and according to the AP:
“Many of those waivers were not enacted, and groups said Thursday that even programs that had been initially identified as life-saving had lost their funding permanently in the new order.”[]
So for now, everything is still kind of in limbo.
So, while we wait to see how that plays out, the second big piece of Trump administration news I want to hit on is that the Pentagon has issued a memo ordering the military to remove transgender troops who are currently enlisted.
And this move actually represents a major shift from Trump’s first term.
Right, while the Defense Department under Trump’s first administration effectively banned trans people from joining the military, it did allow troops already enlisted to stay.
Now, of course, Biden reversed that policy when he assumed power,
But shortly after taking office, Trump signed an executive order that didn’t immediately prohibit trans people from serving in the military but paved the way for a ban by directing the Pentagon to revise medical standards.
And not long after that, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo on February 7th that was obtained by the media and said that the military would stop accepting any new trans troops who wished to join the military.
As well as pausing all gender-affirming care for trans service members who have already joined.
But, at the time, the memo just said that trans troops currently serving would “be treated with dignity and respect,” and noted that the DoD had the authority to provide “additional policy and implementation guidance” to those service members.
So, as a result, the public and the media were operating under the assumption that this was similar the the policy enacted under Trump’s first term — that new trans recruits couldn’t join, but those already serving could continue.
But the memo we’re talking about today actually PREDATES the February 7th one by one day.
We’re just only finding out about it now because it was ALSO made public as part of court filings in a lawsuit against Trump’s order.
With the February 6th memo explicitly stating that, quote:
“Military service by Service members and applicants for military service who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria is incompatible with military service.”
And going on to say that the only exception will be when there is “a compelling Government interest” to keep a current service or admit a new applicant who “directly supports warfighting capabilities.”
But those people will be given waivers on a case-by-case basis, and they will have to meet certain requirements.
Including demonstrating “36 consecutive months of stability” in their sex “without clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.”
As well as proving that they have never “attempted to transition to any sex other than their sex.”
And showing that they are “willing and able to adhere to all applicable standards, including the standards associated with the Service member's sex.”
What’s more, those who are granted waivers will still face certain restrictions, like being blocked from accessing “intimate spaces” like changing rooms, bathrooms, and showers that are reserved for troops of the gender they transitioned to.
Now, as for the service members who don’t get a waiver, the memo directs the secretaries of each military branch to identify all trans troops within 30 days and then to “begin separation actions” with non-exempt members 30 days after that.
Right, and with that, it’s not currently known exactly how many trans people serve in the military.
Advocates place upper estimates at 15,000, but officials have said it’s in the low thousands.
But regardless, you have many advocates and trans service members condemning the move, like Air Force Master Sgt. Logan Ireland, who has served openly trans for about a decade, and who told CNN:
“Thousands of transgender service members like me currently occupy critical roles, many requiring years of specialized training and expertise. Removing us would create significant operational gaps that could take over a decade to fill, undermining the readiness and effectiveness of the armed forces.”
But, with the revelation of this previously unknown memo, it’s very likely that we will see new lawsuits or at least expansions of ones already ongoing.
And the final piece of Trump news I want to hit on today is that the president has now said he is officially moving forward with tariffs on Mexico and Canada after confusion over whether he would extend a pause.
Right, earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25% tariff on imports from two of our biggest allies, as well as a 10% increase on goods from China.
Arguing that the move was necessary to address “the extraordinary threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs, including deadly fentanyl” which constituted a national emergency.
And asserting that the tariffs would be in place “Until the crisis is alleviated.”
But Trump pretty quickly announced that he would be pausing the tariffs on Canada and Mexico from taking effect for a month after leaders from both countries promised to take measures to address his concerns.
And yesterday, a lot of people thought that Trump was going to extend those pauses because of conflicting statements made by the president himself and his administration.
Right, during a press conference, we saw Trump say this:
But, according to The New York Times, a White House official later told reporters that Trump was actually talking about OTHER tariffs that will be put in place, not those on Mexico and Canada.
With Trump himself also saying in a post on Truth Social today that the tariffs on Mexico and Canada will still go into effect on March 4th, writing:
“Drugs are still pouring into our country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels. A large percentage of these Drugs, much of them in the form of Fentanyl, are made in, and supplied by, China.”[]
And then going on to announce that, on the same day, an additional 10% will also be imposed on China on top of the 10% he already set earlier this month.
And then adding, “The April Second Reciprocal Tariff date will remain in full force and effect.”
Now, as of recording, it’s unclear what exactly those reciprocal tariffs will be and if he’s saying he will put even more tariffs on Mexico and Canada than the previously stated 25% on that April 2nd date.
It’s also possible he could be talking about a new 25% tariff that he said he would be putting on the EU during the same press conference yesterday.
-
Canada’s embattled Liberal Party may have just been given a lifeline by the most unlikely ally -- President Donald Trump.
For years the party has been losing popularity under the leadership of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to the point that it was expected they would get pounded in upcoming elections by the Conservative Party.
Just six weeks ago, the Conservatives had a 26-point lead in polling, with their strategy largely being to attack the extremely unpopular Trudeau. []
But things are taking a turn.
Some of that is due the anticipation of a new Liberal leader on March 9th after Trudeau announced he was stepping down.
But the biggest factor is Trump’s rhetoric.
Right, he’s made it seem like the US isn’t committed to defense treaties, is imposing massive tariffs, and ultimately wants to make Canada the 51st state.
All that has led to a huge wave of anti-Trump sentiment across Canada.
It’s to the point that 85% of Canadians say they are replacing or have replaced American goods when shopping.
By brewing in charge, the Liberal party gets to portray itself as the ones opposing Trump and “defending” Canada.
On top of that, they’ve been spending a lot of effort comparing Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre to Trump over the past year. (Paul-ee-ev PRONUNCIATION @0:49)
Such as last January, when they tweeted:
“Trump just won the New Hampshire primary, moving him one step closer to the White House – and Pierre Poilievre is ripping a page out of his playbook.”
And that was accompanied by this video 0:17-end[]
And more recently at the debates for the Liberal leadership this week, we saw the candidates really blasting him, saying things like:
“Who’s the worst person to stand up to Donald Trump? It’s Pierre Poilievre. He worships the man. He uses his language. He’s not the right person for our country at this crucial time.” 0:48
Considering they are both on the right side of the political spectrum a lot of those comparisons are easy… even if they are sometimes a stretch.
Right, his party as a whole is more like Center-right.
And we’re talking about Canada here, so the “center” of their politics is slightly to the left of ours.
For example take LGBTQ+ rights:
Poilievre has made it clear that “Same sex marriage is legal and it will remain legal when I am prime minister, full stop.”
But at the same time he’s made it clear that he’s not interested in trans issues and largely dodges questions about the topic. []
Conservative strategists have also said that they aren’t worried about the comparisons… despite the fact they seem to be working.
And don’t take my word for: recent polling by Ipsos had the Liberals surge to 38% compared to the Conservatives 36%.
That’s a massive comeback compared to that 26 point lead the Conservatives had.
Ipsos isn’t the only one coming to those numbers either -- other major pollsters across the country have similar results.
That being said, if elections were held today neither party would have enough to form a government on their own and would need the support of the various smaller parties.
Which leads to highly unstable governments that usually only last a year or two.
So if this trend continues, Canada might be in for more elections.
But we’ll just have to wait and see.
-
This professor was diagnosed with terminal cancer and instead of leaving his job, he taught a class about his real-time experience.
Right, this is Dr. Bryant Lin - he’s a 50 year old professor of medicine at Stanford University, a primary care physician, and a founder of the Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education. []
He’s also a married father of 2 teenage sons.
Last spring, he developed a nasty cough that just kept getting worse and when he got a CT scan, they found a large mass in his lungs which was confirmed to be cancer.
And it had spread - metastasizing to his liver, his bones, and his brain. []
To make matters worse, it was advancing fast - Dr. Lin’s weight dropped and he was in pain.
His doctor put him on a targeted therapy meant to attack the specific mutation that was driving his cancer and he also had to go through chemotherapy. []
After a few cycles of that, his breathing and coughing were getting better and he continued teaching and seeing patients.
But Dr. Lin estimated that he only has roughly 2 years left until the medicine he’s on stops working. []
So he started thinking about what he wanted to do with the short remainder of his life.
Which brings us to four months after Dr. Lin learned he has terminal cancer - when he stood in front of his class for a 10-week medical school course titled, “From Diagnosis to Dialogue: A Doctor’s Real-Time Battle With Cancer.” []
Registration reportedly filled up almost immediately and students crammed into the room - some sitting on the floor and even more being turned away at the door. []
At the beginning of the class, Dr. Lin opened a letter he had gotten years earlier from a patient dying of chronic kidney disease that read,
“‘I wanted to thank you so much for taking such good care of me in my old age. You treated me as you would treat your own father.’” []
And Dr. Lin said that this class was like his own letter - “part of what I’m doing to give back to my community as I go through this.” []
But the class wasn’t the doom and gloom, existential-crisis inducing experience you may expect.
In fact, the New York Times says that Dr. Lin’s students reported that he remained upbeat and was cracking jokes throughout the class. []
He reportedly made jokes about his wife trying to get him to clean up his diet and, when his own oncologist came in as a guest speaker, Dr. Lin asked him about what comes next for patients who develop a resistance to drugs in their treatment.
And followed that question up with, “Asking for a friend!” []
One student, who reportedly took this class in order to learn how to broach the conversation of his mother’s cancer journey with her, asked Dr. Lin about his motives for teaching this class.
And whether it was some way of regaining a sense of control over his diagnosis. []
To which Dr. Lin replied no - saying he tries not to dwell on the things outside his control.
Adding,
“I’m very conscious that I have limited time left. So I think about that. How am I going to live my life today? Is this a worthwhile way to spend my time?” []
But Dr. Lin’s generally jovial nature doesn’t mean the class didn’t cover some heavy topics.
There was a session on having difficult conversations - where Dr. Lin stressed that doctors need to be honest enough to say “I don’t know.” []
Which is a response that he himself had to get used to hearing amid all the uncertainties about his diagnosis.
Another session talked about the psychological impact of cancer - how disappointed he felt when he saw the scans that showed his tumors had shrunk but not disappeared. []
Because he was still hoping for a miracle.
He brought in guest speakers like a thoracic surgeon who placed Dr. Lin’s diagnosis in the broader context of lung cancer among non-smokers - particularly among Asian populations. []
Saying,
“In the U.S., about 20 percent of people diagnosed with lung cancer never smoked. But in Asian populations and Asian American populations, that could be really up to 80 percent in some racial and ethnic groups.” []
And then there was a session on caregiving, when Dr. Lin brought in his wife.
She talked about how she was overwhelmed at first - buried under a bunch of medical terms that she didn’t understand. []
She reportedly spoke to the class as if they were or at some point would be caregivers themselves.
Telling them to lean on friends and family but keep in mind that organizing people who offer to help, even with the best of intentions, is a task in and of itself.
And lastly, she acknowledged how hard it was to let go of the instinct to plan for the future - saying,
“We just have to go through it one day at a time.” []
But Dr. Lin also had experiences that didn’t make the syllabus - telling the New York Times that more than once he felt like time was flying by him. []
Or he would see an older person out in public and be reminded that he likely wouldn’t live to that age. []
Or having to explain to his sons what his diagnosis meant.
At the end of the 10 weeks, he told his class how lucky he is - for his family, his teaching assistants, his colleagues, the community at Stanford, his students and residents, his patients, and his friends. []
Saying,
“So I close in saying that I may have had a tough break, but I have an awful lot to live for. Thank you. And it’s been an honor.” []
At the beginning of the class, Dr. Lin told the New York Times that he hoped that some of the students that took his course would go on to dedicate themselves to cancer care.
And he seemed to have gotten his wish because when he asked how many were considering a career in the field at the end of the course, roughly a third raised their hands.
And those planning on being doctors said that they would remember Dr. Lin’s story when trying to understand their patients’ experiences.
But the effect of this class went beyond just career choices.
Several students reportedly told the Times that they pushed their parents to get screened for lung cancer.
And one master’s student reportedly decided to work on integrating vocabulary about lung cancer into the Mandarin class for medical trainees that they planned to assist in. []
And I would love to know your thoughts about this story - especially if you have experience with cancer.
And even if you don’t, would you take a class like Dr. Lin’s if given the opportunity?
Let me know in those comments down below.
-
What if there was a pill to make your dog live longer?
Surprise! There is and it just passed a key FDA hurdle.
Right, the company is called Loyal and it’s a biotech company based out of San Francisco.
They have reportedly raised more than $150 million since 2019 for the development of their lifespan-extending drug that is, for now, focused on dogs. []
With the drug’s goal being to improve dogs’ overall metabolic fitness or their body’s ability to convert nutrients into energy and regulate hormones. []
Which declines in both dogs and humans as they age.
And now, the FDA has certified Loyal’s daily pill as having a, quote, “reasonable expectation of effectiveness” at extending the life of senior dogs. []
There are still a couple hoops to jump through - the Center for Veterinary Medicine still needs to certify that the drug is safe and that Loyal can manufacture it at the appropriate scale before vets can prescribe it.
And, as of now, that prescription would be for dogs 10 years old and up and at least 14 pounds. []
But Loyal’s CEO Celine Halioua (Hawl-ee-wah) called the FDA’s initial recognition here a “key step” and estimates that the whole process should be complete by the end of the year. []
And the Washington Post reports that Loyal plans on launching the pill under an FDA clearance for animal drugs called conditional approval.
Which allows a company to start selling a treatment that has been deemed safe and reasonably expected to work so they can gain more data to prove its efficacy while it's on the market. []
A glaring unanswered question here though is the price tag.
With Celine saying the cost has yet to be determined but her goal is to make it as accessible as possible - hopefully, less than $100 a month.
Adding that she’d rather see the pill widely adopted than, quote, “jacking up the price and getting the millionaire dogs on the drug.” []
And the potential of this goes beyond just dogs - with Celine telling the Washington Post,
“If we can successfully delay the onset and severity of age-related diseases in dogs, it’s extremely compelling evidence that it will also do that in humans.” []
But not everyone is onboard with this idea.
With Deborah Kado, co-director of the Stanford Center on Longevity, saying that while the idea of just giving their dogs a pill to make them live longer may be appealing to owners, problems can often pop up with new drugs that are still in testing. []
And she also pointed out that with so many rescue dogs in need of loving homes, maybe holding on longer than is natural isn’t a good thing. []
Adding that one of the many things she admires about dogs is their capacity to live in the moment, saying,
“When they get close to the end, they accept it. And in a way, that I think makes it easier for humans actually. Endings are going to happen.” []
But I would love to know your thoughts about this - especially from all the dog lovers out there.
Is this something you’d consider for your fur baby?
Let me know in those comments down below.
